Example of red herring fallacy3/12/2023 ![]() Person A gives their position or argument–call it argument X.Person B: My opponent thinks we should give children AK-47s for self-protection when their parents aren’t home. Person A: If you deny people the right to self-defense then you are risking increasing the rate home break-ins because a major deterrent will have been removed.In person A’s world, citizen’s won’t be able to lawfully defend themselves or even go hunting. ![]() Person B: My opponent doesn’t think people have the right to own guns. Person A: Given the tragic nature of mass shootings, we should consider implementing some sort of background check to make sure people buying guys don’t have any known major psychological problems or any records of violent criminal behavior.If you can show that even the strongest arguments against your view fail, you’re the winner! If you fail to address the strongest arguments then you’ve won a hollow victory. Pro tip: Even if some people that oppose your view on an issue make genuinely bad or stupid arguments, always address the strongest possible argument against your position. Person 2: Whatever, I took out the trash yesterday.ĭefinition: A restatement of an opposing view/position which is exaggerated and distorted such that it is easy to defeat. Person 1: It’s your turn to do the dishes. Contextual relevance is about whether an entire argument has a logical relationship to the topic that is being debated. In the context of a debate between two sides, contextual relevance is the degree to which a response or line of argument has a logical relationship to the main issue being debated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |